State Government vs Rakesh Jaiswal Advocate - Brijesh Nath Tripathi — 200296/2009
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,504,506,352,336,427,134,283,436,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th March 2026.
Session Trial
CNR: UPGK010000202009
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200296/2009
Filing Date
29-09-2009
Registration No
200296/2009
Registration Date
29-09-2009
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Additional District & Session Judge CNo. 4
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
570
Police Station
Jhagahan
Year
2008
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. ADGC
Respondent(s)
Rakesh Jaiswal Advocate - Brijesh Nath Tripathi
Deelip
Gaori
Ramsajan
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Additional District & Session Judge CNo. 4
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 19-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted three accused persons—Rakesh Jaysawal, Dilip, and Gobri—of charges under IPC sections 143, 504/149, 506/149, 352/149, 336/149, 427/149, 341/149, 283/149, 436/149, and sections 3/4 of the Public Property Damage Prevention Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent eyewitness corroborated the alleged incident of arson at a police booth and vehicle damage on May 3, 2008, and the prosecution witnesses were all police personnel with potential bias. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted three accused persons—Rakesh Jaysawal, Dilip, and Gobri—of charges under IPC sections 143, 504/149, 506/149, 352/149, 336/149, 427/149, 341/149, 283/149, 436/149, and sections 3/4 of the Public Property Damage Prevention Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent eyewitness corroborated the alleged incident of arson at a police booth and vehicle damage on May 3, 2008, and the prosecution witnesses were all police personnel with potential bias. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts