Uttar Pradesh vs Harikesh Singh — 504/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 201,304-B,498-A. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: UPGD010030312024

Filing Number

2560/2024

Filing Date

26-Jun-2024

Registration No

504/2024

Registration Date

26-Jun-2024

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge-III

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

88

Police Station

PARASPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 201,304-B,498-A
Prevention of Dowry Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Uttar Pradesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Harikesh Singh

  2. 2.Reeta Singh

  3. 3.Ramkeval

  4. 4.Pawan Kumar Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary State of Madhya Pradesh v. Harikesh Singh & Others (Session Trial Case No. 504/2024, Gonda District Court) The court convicted all four accused under IPC Section 304B (dowry death) and sentenced them to 10 years imprisonment. The accused were also convicted under IPC Sections 498A (husband/relatives cruelty toward wife) with 3 years imprisonment and fine of ₹20,000, and under the Dowry Prohibition Act Section 4 with 2 years imprisonment and ₹10,000 fine. The case involved the death of a young married woman (Komal Singh) whose decomposed body was recovered from the Ghaghara River. Medical evidence confirmed death by asphyxiation from ligature marks on the neck. Prosecution witnesses consistently testified to dowry harassment and cruelty, while defense witnesses' claims of the victim's illness were found unsubstantiated. The court found the accused guilty based on circumstantial evidence and prosecution testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge-III

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. District Judge-III

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Addl. District Judge-III

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Addl. District Judge-III

  7. 19-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Statement U/S 313

    Addl. District Judge-III

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Statement U/S 313

    Addl. District Judge-III

  10. 27-Feb-2026

    Statement U/S 313

    Addl. District Judge-III

  11. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  12. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  13. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  14. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  15. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  16. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  17. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  18. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  19. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  20. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  21. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  22. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  23. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  24. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  25. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  26. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  27. 06-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  28. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  29. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District Judge-III

  30. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  31. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  32. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  33. 19-May-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  34. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  35. 10-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  36. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  37. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  38. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  39. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  40. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  41. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  42. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  43. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  44. 20-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  45. 06-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  46. 23-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  47. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  48. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  49. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  50. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  51. 07-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  52. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  53. 09-Aug-2024

    Charge

    District and Sessions Judge

  54. 29-Jul-2024

    Charge

    District and Sessions Judge

  55. 12-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 26-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 504/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary State of Madhya Pradesh v. Harikesh Singh & Others (Session Trial Case No. 504/2024, Gonda District Court) The court convicted all four accused under IPC Section 304B (dowry death) and sentenced them to 10 years imprisonment. The accused were also convicted under IPC Sections 498A (husband/relatives cruelty toward wife) with 3 years imprisonment and fine of ₹20,000, and under the Dowry Prohibition Act Section 4 with 2 years imprisonment and ₹10,000 fine. The case involved the death of a young married woman (Komal Singh) whose decomposed body was recovered from the Ghaghara River. Medical evidence confirmed death by asphyxiation from ligature marks on the neck. Prosecution witnesses consistently testified to dowry harassment and cruelty, while defense witnesses' claims of the victim's illness were found unsubstantiated. The court found the accused guilty based on circumstantial evidence and prosecution testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case