ATul kumar vs Uttar Pradesh — 547/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGD010016282026

Filing Number

1493/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

547/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

38-ADJ/Special Judge (Pocso)

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

DHANEPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ATul kumar

    Adv. Ajay Kumar Tiwari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uttar Pradesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to accused Atul Kumar in a case under IPC Section 352 (criminal intimidation) at Dhanepur Police Station, Gonda District, where he was accused of verbally abusing and threatening a minor girl. The court found that an FIR had already been registered with sufficient evidence for chargesheet, there was no prior criminal history, and relying on the Supreme Court's precedent in Satender Kumar Antil case, determined the accused was entitled to bail. The accused was released on bail of ₹20,000 with personal recognizance and a surety of equal amount, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ/Special Judge (Pocso)

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 547/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to accused Atul Kumar in a case under IPC Section 352 (criminal intimidation) at Dhanepur Police Station, Gonda District, where he was accused of verbally abusing and threatening a minor girl. The court found that an FIR had already been registered with sufficient evidence for chargesheet, there was no prior criminal history, and relying on the Supreme Court's precedent in Satender Kumar Antil case, determined the accused was entitled to bail. The accused was released on bail of ₹20,000 with personal recognizance and a surety of equal amount, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case