Mohit Chauahan vs Uttar Pradesh — 546/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,115(2),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGD010016162026

Filing Number

1482/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

546/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

38-ADJ/Special Judge (Pocso)

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

138

Police Station

KHODAREY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,115(2),352,351(3)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules Section 3(1)द,ध,w
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 7/8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohit Chauahan

    Adv. Jai Vardhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uttar Pradesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge (POCSO Act), Gonda granted bail to accused Mohit Chauhan in Case No. 138/2025 under IPC Sections 74, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and POCSO Act Sections 7/8 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1). The court found that while charges include assault and abusive language toward the victim, the accused had been on interim bail without violating conditions, and medical reports showed only minor injuries, warranting bail on personal bond of ₹20,000 with standard conditions including cooperation during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ/Special Judge (Pocso)

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ/Special Judge (Pocso)

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ/Special Judge (Pocso)

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 546/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (POCSO Act), Gonda granted bail to accused Mohit Chauhan in Case No. 138/2025 under IPC Sections 74, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and POCSO Act Sections 7/8 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1). The court found that while charges include assault and abusive language toward the victim, the accused had been on interim bail without violating conditions, and medical reports showed only minor injuries, warranting bail on personal bond of ₹20,000 with standard conditions including cooperation during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case