Dhan Prakash and ors vs Uttar Pradesh — 542/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 326(G), 3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGD010016142026

Filing Number

1480/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

542/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

65

Police Station

MOTIGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 326(G), 3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dhan Prakash and ors

    Adv. Krishna Chandra Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uttar Pradesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge of Gonda rejected the anticipatory bail application of Dhanprakash and Khuti @ Jai Prakash, who were accused of arson under BNS Section 326(G), finding the offense heinous and punishable with life imprisonment. The court relied on the complainant's statement and eyewitness testimonies supporting the prosecution version that the accused set fire to the complainant's hut, causing significant property damage, and noted the accused's non-cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 542/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge of Gonda rejected the anticipatory bail application of Dhanprakash and Khuti @ Jai Prakash, who were accused of arson under BNS Section 326(G), finding the offense heinous and punishable with life imprisonment. The court relied on the complainant's statement and eyewitness testimonies supporting the prosecution version that the accused set fire to the complainant's hut, causing significant property damage, and noted the accused's non-cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case