Rajendra Kumar vs Uttar Pradesh — 539/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4), 305A, 317(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGD010016132026

Filing Number

1479/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

539/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge- I

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

37

Police Station

KHODAREY

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4), 305A, 317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajendra Kumar

    Adv. Ram Bilas Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uttar Pradesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Gonda granted bail to accused Rajendra Kumar in case crime no. 37/2026 under IPC sections 331(4), 305, and 317(2) for an alleged house theft. The court found that the FIR was delayed without justification, the accused was not named in the initial report, there were no independent witnesses, and no prior criminal history was established against him. The accused was granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000 with surety and subject to specified conditions including cooperation with investigation and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge- I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 539/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Gonda granted bail to accused Rajendra Kumar in case crime no. 37/2026 under IPC sections 331(4), 305, and 317(2) for an alleged house theft. The court found that the FIR was delayed without justification, the accused was not named in the initial report, there were no independent witnesses, and no prior criminal history was established against him. The accused was granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000 with surety and subject to specified conditions including cooperation with investigation and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case