Abu Hanzala @ Sadik vs Uttar Pradesh — 533/2026

Case under Cow Slaughter Act Section 3/5a/8. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGD010016102026

Filing Number

1476/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

533/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge-III

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

09

Police Station

COLONELGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Cow Slaughter Act Section 3/5a/8
Animal Cruelty Act Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Abu Hanzala @ Sadik

    Adv. Abdul Hadi Khan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uttar Pradesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary The court granted bail to Abu Injala Urf Sadiq in a cattle smuggling case under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Cow Slaughter Prevention Act. The court found that the accused was not named in the FIR, had no recovery made from him, and no independent witnesses corroborated the charges, while a co-accused had already been granted bail. Bail was approved on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge-III

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge-III

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 533/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted bail to Abu Injala Urf Sadiq in a cattle smuggling case under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Cow Slaughter Prevention Act. The court found that the accused was not named in the FIR, had no recovery made from him, and no independent witnesses corroborated the charges, while a co-accused had already been granted bail. Bail was approved on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case