Shiv Kishor vs Uttar Pradesh — 477/2026

Case under Essential Commodities Act Section 3/7. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGD010014732026

Filing Number

1351/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

477/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

478

Police Station

MANKAPUR

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Essential Commodities Act Section 3/7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shiv Kishor

    Adv. Dinesh Narayan Pandey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uttar Pradesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (E.C. Act) at Gonda rejected the anticipatory bail application (No. 477/2026) filed by accused Shiv Kishor in case No. 478/2019 under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The court found that the accused had illegally transported and distributed government food grains using a vehicle, violating Essential Commodities Act provisions and distribution guidelines, and that no valid grounds existed to grant anticipatory bail given the serious nature of the offense and lack of evidence supporting claims of false prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 477/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (E.C. Act) at Gonda rejected the anticipatory bail application (No. 477/2026) filed by accused Shiv Kishor in case No. 478/2019 under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The court found that the accused had illegally transported and distributed government food grains using a vehicle, violating Essential Commodities Act provisions and distribution guidelines, and that no valid grounds existed to grant anticipatory bail given the serious nature of the offense and lack of evidence supporting claims of false prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case