Shiv Kishor vs Uttar Pradesh — 477/2026

Case under Essential Commodities Act Section 3/7. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPGD010014732026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1351/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

477/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (EC . Act)

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

478

Police Station

MANKAPUR

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Essential Commodities Act Section 3/7

Petitioner(s)

Shiv Kishor

Adv. Dinesh Narayan Pandey

Respondent(s)

Uttar Pradesh

Hearing History

Judge: 5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (EC . Act)

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Hearing

05-03-2026

Hearing

26-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Bail Order

Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (E.C. Act) at Gonda rejected the anticipatory bail application (No. 477/2026) filed by accused Shiv Kishor in case No. 478/2019 under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The court found that the accused had illegally transported and distributed government food grains using a vehicle, violating Essential Commodities Act provisions and distribution guidelines, and that no valid grounds existed to grant anticipatory bail given the serious nature of the offense and lack of evidence supporting claims of false prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (E.C. Act) at Gonda rejected the anticipatory bail application (No. 477/2026) filed by accused Shiv Kishor in case No. 478/2019 under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The court found that the accused had illegally transported and distributed government food grains using a vehicle, violating Essential Commodities Act provisions and distribution guidelines, and that no valid grounds existed to grant anticipatory bail given the serious nature of the offense and lack of evidence supporting claims of false prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case