Shiv Kishor vs Uttar Pradesh — 477/2026
Case under Essential Commodities Act Section 3/7. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPGD010014732026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1351/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
477/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (EC . Act)
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
478
Police Station
MANKAPUR
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shiv Kishor
Adv. Dinesh Narayan Pandey
Respondent(s)
Uttar Pradesh
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (EC . Act)
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (E.C. Act) at Gonda rejected the anticipatory bail application (No. 477/2026) filed by accused Shiv Kishor in case No. 478/2019 under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The court found that the accused had illegally transported and distributed government food grains using a vehicle, violating Essential Commodities Act provisions and distribution guidelines, and that no valid grounds existed to grant anticipatory bail given the serious nature of the offense and lack of evidence supporting claims of false prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (E.C. Act) at Gonda rejected the anticipatory bail application (No. 477/2026) filed by accused Shiv Kishor in case No. 478/2019 under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The court found that the accused had illegally transported and distributed government food grains using a vehicle, violating Essential Commodities Act provisions and distribution guidelines, and that no valid grounds existed to grant anticipatory bail given the serious nature of the offense and lack of evidence supporting claims of false prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts