Mohammad Farooq vs Uttar Pradesh — 483/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A, 304B. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGD010014582026

Filing Number

1338/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

483/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge- I

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

180

Police Station

CHHAPIA

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A, 304B
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohammad Farooq

    Adv. Amit Dwivedi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uttar Pradesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application (No. 483/2026) of Mohammad Farooq in a dowry harassment and abetment to suicide case (FIR 180/2020 under IPC sections 498A, 304B, and DPTA sections 3/4). The court found that the applicant was added to the case during investigation and that the available evidence indicated his involvement in the alleged offense of harassing the deceased bride for dowry, making the case too serious to grant anticipatory bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge- I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Restored

    Addl. District Judge- I

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge- I

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge- I

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 483/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application (No. 483/2026) of Mohammad Farooq in a dowry harassment and abetment to suicide case (FIR 180/2020 under IPC sections 498A, 304B, and DPTA sections 3/4). The court found that the applicant was added to the case during investigation and that the available evidence indicated his involvement in the alleged offense of harassing the deceased bride for dowry, making the case too serious to grant anticipatory bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case