Jhinne singh alias Arvind Singh vs Uttar Pradesh — 470/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 272,273. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPGD010014172026

Filing Number

1298/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

470/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

163

Police Station

COLONELGANJ

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 272,273
U.p. Excise Act, 1910 Section 60

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jhinne singh alias Arvind Singh

    Adv. Om Prakash Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uttar Pradesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court, Gonda rejected the anticipatory bail application of Chinne Singh s/o Arvind Singh in a 2015 excise and IPC case involving alleged illegal transport and sale of country liquor. The court found clear evidence of the applicant's involvement in the offense, noting his motorcycle was seized with contraband liquor and he was named by co-accused persons, and therefore denied bail on grounds of the case's serious nature and no reasonable apprehension of harassment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 470/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Gonda rejected the anticipatory bail application of Chinne Singh s/o Arvind Singh in a 2015 excise and IPC case involving alleged illegal transport and sale of country liquor. The court found clear evidence of the applicant's involvement in the offense, noting his motorcycle was seized with contraband liquor and he was named by co-accused persons, and therefore denied bail on grounds of the case's serious nature and no reasonable apprehension of harassment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case