Anirudha Singh vs Sawami nath — 106/2026

Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report

CNR: UPGD010011502026

Filing Number

1055/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

106/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

443

Police Station

Anti Power Theft

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Electricity Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anirudha Singh

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sawami nath

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    orderView PDF

    Summary The court accepted the final investigation report (FIR No. 106/2026) in a case under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act involving accused Swami Deen charged with illegal use of 2-kilowatt electricity without proper connection. The court closed the case, noting that the accused had paid the required settlement and revenue fees to the electricity office, and the complainant raised no objections to the final report's acceptance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    For Disposal

    ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    For Disposal

    ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    For Disposal

    ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 106/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court accepted the final investigation report (FIR No. 106/2026) in a case under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act involving accused Swami Deen charged with illegal use of 2-kilowatt electricity without proper connection. The court closed the case, noting that the accused had paid the required settlement and revenue fees to the electricity office, and the complainant raised no objections to the final report's acceptance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case