Amit Patel vs Ram Chhatra — 101/2026
Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 14th March 2026.
Final Report
CNR: UPGD010011452026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1050/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
101/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (EC . Act)
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
744
Police Station
Anti Power Theft
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amit Patel
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
Ram Chhatra
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (EC . Act)
Disposed
For Disposal
For Disposal
For Disposal
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | For Disposal | |
| 05-03-2026 | For Disposal | |
| 23-02-2026 | For Disposal |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court accepted the final investigation report (No. 101/2026) submitted by the investigating officer in case No. 744/2023 under Section 138 of the Indian Electricity Act against accused Ramchandra and Shivaram, who were found illegally using electricity by reconnecting a previously disconnected cable without permission and without paying outstanding bills. The case proceedings were closed as the complainant Amit Patel (the sub-engineer) did not raise any objections to the final report, and the court found that the accused had subsequently deposited their settlement and revenue fees at the electricity office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court accepted the final investigation report (No. 101/2026) submitted by the investigating officer in case No. 744/2023 under Section 138 of the Indian Electricity Act against accused Ramchandra and Shivaram, who were found illegally using electricity by reconnecting a previously disconnected cable without permission and without paying outstanding bills. The case proceedings were closed as the complainant Amit Patel (the sub-engineer) did not raise any objections to the final report, and the court found that the accused had subsequently deposited their settlement and revenue fees at the electricity office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts