Amit Patel vs Ram Chhatra — 101/2026

Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report

CNR: UPGD010011452026

Filing Number

1050/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

101/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

744

Police Station

Anti Power Theft

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Electricity Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amit Patel

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ram Chhatra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    orderView PDF

    The court accepted the final investigation report (No. 101/2026) submitted by the investigating officer in case No. 744/2023 under Section 138 of the Indian Electricity Act against accused Ramchandra and Shivaram, who were found illegally using electricity by reconnecting a previously disconnected cable without permission and without paying outstanding bills. The case proceedings were closed as the complainant Amit Patel (the sub-engineer) did not raise any objections to the final report, and the court found that the accused had subsequently deposited their settlement and revenue fees at the electricity office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    For Disposal

    ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    For Disposal

    ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the final investigation report (No. 101/2026) submitted by the investigating officer in case No. 744/2023 under Section 138 of the Indian Electricity Act against accused Ramchandra and Shivaram, who were found illegally using electricity by reconnecting a previously disconnected cable without permission and without paying outstanding bills. The case proceedings were closed as the complainant Amit Patel (the sub-engineer) did not raise any objections to the final report, and the court found that the accused had subsequently deposited their settlement and revenue fees at the electricity office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case