Amit Patel vs Ram Chhatra — 101/2026

Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 14th March 2026.

Final Report

CNR: UPGD010011452026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1050/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

101/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (EC . Act)

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

744

Police Station

Anti Power Theft

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Electricity Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Amit Patel

Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

Ram Chhatra

Hearing History

Judge: 5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (EC . Act)

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

For Disposal

05-03-2026

For Disposal

23-02-2026

For Disposal

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
order

The court accepted the final investigation report (No. 101/2026) submitted by the investigating officer in case No. 744/2023 under Section 138 of the Indian Electricity Act against accused Ramchandra and Shivaram, who were found illegally using electricity by reconnecting a previously disconnected cable without permission and without paying outstanding bills. The case proceedings were closed as the complainant Amit Patel (the sub-engineer) did not raise any objections to the final report, and the court found that the accused had subsequently deposited their settlement and revenue fees at the electricity office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the final investigation report (No. 101/2026) submitted by the investigating officer in case No. 744/2023 under Section 138 of the Indian Electricity Act against accused Ramchandra and Shivaram, who were found illegally using electricity by reconnecting a previously disconnected cable without permission and without paying outstanding bills. The case proceedings were closed as the complainant Amit Patel (the sub-engineer) did not raise any objections to the final report, and the court found that the accused had subsequently deposited their settlement and revenue fees at the electricity office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case