Vikash Yadav vs Seema — 79/2026

Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 14th March 2026.

Final Report

CNR: UPGD010010822026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

989/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

79/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (EC . Act)

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

358

Police Station

Anti Power Theft

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Electricity Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

Vikash Yadav

Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

Seema

Hearing History

Judge: 5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (EC . Act)

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

For Disposal

12-03-2026

For Disposal

10-03-2026

For Disposal

09-03-2026

For Disposal

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
order

The court accepted the final investigation report (No. 79/2026) filed by the investigating officer in Criminal Case No. 358/2023 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, Gonda district, after finding no objections from the complainant Vikas Yadav. The case proceedings were closed as the investigation found insufficient evidence against the accused despite initial allegations of illegal electricity usage through meter tampering and direct cable connections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the final investigation report (No. 79/2026) filed by the investigating officer in Criminal Case No. 358/2023 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, Gonda district, after finding no objections from the complainant Vikas Yadav. The case proceedings were closed as the investigation found insufficient evidence against the accused despite initial allegations of illegal electricity usage through meter tampering and direct cable connections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case