Vikash Yadav vs Seema — 79/2026
Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 14th March 2026.
Final Report
CNR: UPGD010010822026
Filing Number
989/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
79/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
358
Police Station
Anti Power Theft
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vikash Yadav
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Seema
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
orderView PDF
The court accepted the final investigation report (No. 79/2026) filed by the investigating officer in Criminal Case No. 358/2023 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, Gonda district, after finding no objections from the complainant Vikas Yadav. The case proceedings were closed as the investigation found insufficient evidence against the accused despite initial allegations of illegal electricity usage through meter tampering and direct cable connections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)
-
13-Mar-2026
For Disposal
ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)
-
12-Mar-2026
For Disposal
ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)
-
10-Mar-2026
For Disposal
ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)
-
09-Mar-2026
For Disposal
ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)
-
05-Mar-2026
For Disposal
ADJ/Spl. Judge (Ec . Act)
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 79/2026
The court accepted the final investigation report (No. 79/2026) filed by the investigating officer in Criminal Case No. 358/2023 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, Gonda district, after finding no objections from the complainant Vikas Yadav. The case proceedings were closed as the investigation found insufficient evidence against the accused despite initial allegations of illegal electricity usage through meter tampering and direct cable connections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts