Kiran Pandey vs State Of UP — 421/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 17th March 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: UPFZ010069542025
Filing Number
6440/2025
Filing Date
15-11-2025
Registration No
421/2025
Registration Date
17-11-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kiran Pandey
Adv. poornima singh
Respondent(s)
State Of UP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District & Session Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 21-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 09-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Ayodhya Sessions Court dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by Kiran Pandey challenging the lower court's order accepting a final police report (closure) in a rape case (FIR No. 296/2023 under IPC Sections 376D, 506). The court held that the investigating officer conducted a thorough investigation examining all evidence, and the lower court properly exercised its judicial discretion under established legal principles in accepting the closure report after finding insufficient evidence to proceed against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Ayodhya Sessions Court dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by Kiran Pandey challenging the lower court's order accepting a final police report (closure) in a rape case (FIR No. 296/2023 under IPC Sections 376D, 506). The court held that the investigating officer conducted a thorough investigation examining all evidence, and the lower court properly exercised its judicial discretion under established legal principles in accepting the closure report after finding insufficient evidence to proceed against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts