Ajay Kumar Jaisawal vs State of UP and others — 412/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 07th March 2026.

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPFZ010068002025

Case disposed

Filing Number

6300/2025

Filing Date

10-11-2025

Registration No

412/2025

Registration Date

10-11-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

Ajay Kumar Jaisawal

Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

State of UP and others

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District & Session Judge

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Judgement

20-02-2026

Judgement

18-02-2026

Hearing

13-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Ayodhya Session Court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Ajay Kumar Jayaswal against the lower court's order dated 18.10.2025. The court found that the lower court properly rejected the accused's application under Section 311 CrPC (calling a witness for examination) because he had already been given an opportunity for cross-examination which he failed to utilize, and subsequently filed the same application after its earlier rejection on 25.11.2017 without satisfactory grounds. The court held that the lower court's order was legally sound and did not contain any irregularities, impropriety, or illegality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Ayodhya Session Court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Ajay Kumar Jayaswal against the lower court's order dated 18.10.2025. The court found that the lower court properly rejected the accused's application under Section 311 CrPC (calling a witness for examination) because he had already been given an opportunity for cross-examination which he failed to utilize, and subsequently filed the same application after its earlier rejection on 25.11.2017 without satisfactory grounds. The court held that the lower court's order was legally sound and did not contain any irregularities, impropriety, or illegality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case