Pradeep Kumar urf Gulshan and other vs State Of UP — 393/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,323,504,506,452. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPFZ010010722026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1012/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

393/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Spl. J. (SC/ST,Pev. of Atroci Act)

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,323,504,506,452
Prevention of Atrocities (S.C/S.T Act ) Section 3(1)D

Petitioner(s)

Pradeep Kumar urf Gulshan and other

Adv. VIDHYA BHUSHAN SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

State Of UP

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Spl. J. (SC/ST,Pev. of Atroci Act)

11-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Hearing

24-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Special Judge for SC/ST Act in Ayodhya granted bail to accused Pradeep Kumar alias Gulshan and Shiv Kumar Nishad in Case No. 429/2020, charged under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 147 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)d. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the prosecution's opposition, noting that the accused had not misused interim bail previously and observing that the allegation lacked eyewitness corroboration. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹25,000 with two sureties of equal amount pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge for SC/ST Act in Ayodhya granted bail to accused Pradeep Kumar alias Gulshan and Shiv Kumar Nishad in Case No. 429/2020, charged under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 147 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)d. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the prosecution's opposition, noting that the accused had not misused interim bail previously and observing that the allegation lacked eyewitness corroboration. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹25,000 with two sureties of equal amount pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case