prema gupta vs State Of UP — 1/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPFZ010000312026

Filing Number

28/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

02-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.prema gupta

    Adv. ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court in Ayodhya dismissed Prema Gupta's criminal revision petition challenging the lower court's May 12, 2022 order summoning her for trial under IPC Sections 323, 452, 504, and 506 (assault, criminal intimidation, and abetment). The court held that the lower court properly applied the summoning standard, finding prima facie evidence supporting the complainant's allegations that Prema Gupta and Ram Lakhan forcibly entered the complainant's home, assaulted him, and made death threats. The revision petition was rejected as the grounds raised were insufficient to warrant intervention at the revision stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court in Ayodhya dismissed Prema Gupta's criminal revision petition challenging the lower court's May 12, 2022 order summoning her for trial under IPC Sections 323, 452, 504, and 506 (assault, criminal intimidation, and abetment). The court held that the lower court properly applied the summoning standard, finding prima facie evidence supporting the complainant's allegations that Prema Gupta and Ram Lakhan forcibly entered the complainant's home, assaulted him, and made death threats. The revision petition was rejected as the grounds raised were insufficient to warrant intervention at the revision stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case