Manoj singh vs State of U.P. — 548/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(2),3(5),338,308(6). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPFT010013842026

Filing Number

1274/2026

Filing Date

31-Mar-2026

Registration No

548/2026

Registration Date

31-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge court No 1

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 15-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

Cyber Crime PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(2),3(5),338,308(6)
Information Technology Act Section 66C,66D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manoj singh

    Adv. Adarsh dwivedi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Manoj Singh v. State of U.P. (548/2026) The court rejected petitioner Manoj Singh's bail plea in a cyber fraud case. Singh was accused alongside others of orchestrating an online scam involving impersonating police officers, falsely accusing victims of watching pornography, and extorting money via QR codes and UPI links. Though Singh's counsel argued insufficient evidence and improper investigation, the court found the FIR allegations credible and the crimes serious, dismissing the application without commenting on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge court No 1

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge court No 1

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 548/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Manoj Singh v. State of U.P. (548/2026) The court rejected petitioner Manoj Singh's bail plea in a cyber fraud case. Singh was accused alongside others of orchestrating an online scam involving impersonating police officers, falsely accusing victims of watching pornography, and extorting money via QR codes and UPI links. Though Singh's counsel argued insufficient evidence and improper investigation, the court found the FIR allegations credible and the crimes serious, dismissing the application without commenting on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case