JAGJIVANRAM vs YOGESH SHAKYA — 473/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: UPEW010021962025

Filing Number

2012/2025

Filing Date

24-Apr-2025

Registration No

473/2025

Registration Date

24-Apr-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

MISC 393

Police Station

USRAHAR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGJIVANRAM

    Adv. DILIP KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.YOGESH SHAKYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    copy of JudgementView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed under Section 203 CrPC, finding insufficient prima facie evidence to proceed against the accused. The court noted significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding the date and circumstances of the alleged incident, particularly discrepancies between the complainant's statements and his wife's account, which undermined the credibility of the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  8. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  9. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  10. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  11. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  12. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  13. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  14. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  15. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  16. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  17. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  18. 21-May-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  19. 24-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 24-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 473/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed under Section 203 CrPC, finding insufficient prima facie evidence to proceed against the accused. The court noted significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding the date and circumstances of the alleged incident, particularly discrepancies between the complainant's statements and his wife's account, which undermined the credibility of the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case