MADHU DEVI vs JAY KISHAN — 462/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: UPEW010021462025

Filing Number

1965/2025

Filing Date

22-Apr-2025

Registration No

462/2025

Registration Date

22-Apr-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

misc 679

Police Station

BHARTHANA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHU DEVI

    Adv. SANJEEV TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAY KISHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    copy of JudgementView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed under Section 226 of the IPC against the accused. The court found that the complainant's account contained inconsistencies regarding the date of the alleged incident (stated as 12.08.2024 in one document and 18.12.2024 in another), and that the alleged eyewitnesses were not examined during proceedings, leaving the allegations unsupported by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  9. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  10. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  11. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  12. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  13. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  14. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  15. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  16. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  17. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  18. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    IInd A.D.J./Spl. J (Sc/ST, Prev. of Atrocitiy Act)

  19. 06-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 22-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 462/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed under Section 226 of the IPC against the accused. The court found that the complainant's account contained inconsistencies regarding the date of the alleged incident (stated as 12.08.2024 in one document and 18.12.2024 in another), and that the alleged eyewitnesses were not examined during proceedings, leaving the allegations unsupported by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case