PANKAJ KUMAR vs State of UP Advocate - DGC Criminal — 487/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPEW010015942026

Filing Number

1516/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

487/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge/Regular Etawah

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

BASREHAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJ KUMAR

    Adv. BRAJENDRA KUMAR GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP Advocate - DGC Criminal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Aplication for processView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court granted bail to Pankaj Kumar (age 28) in a murder case (IPC Sections 3(5) and 109(1) BNS) on conditional basis. The court found that while the accused was allegedly involved in firing at police personnel during a crime incident, no firearm or ammunition was recovered from his possession, no police officer was injured, and he had no prior criminal history—factors that justified bail with a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and standard conditions regarding court appearance and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge/Regular Etawah

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    hearing

    Addl. District Judge/Regular Etawah

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 487/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court granted bail to Pankaj Kumar (age 28) in a murder case (IPC Sections 3(5) and 109(1) BNS) on conditional basis. The court found that while the accused was allegedly involved in firing at police personnel during a crime incident, no firearm or ammunition was recovered from his possession, no police officer was injured, and he had no prior criminal history—factors that justified bail with a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and standard conditions regarding court appearance and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case