BACHCHU SINGH BALMIKI vs State of UP Advocate - DGC Criminal — 490/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),307,3(5). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPEW010015912026

Filing Number

1513/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

490/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-Spl. Judge (E.c. Act)

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

EKDIL

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),307,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BACHCHU SINGH BALMIKI

    Adv. DEEPANSHU TOMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP Advocate - DGC Criminal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Aplication for processView PDF

    Summary The Special Judge (E.C. Act), Etawah rejected the bail application of Bachu Singh Balmiki in case FIR No. 09/2026 under sections 303(2), 317(2), 307, and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code 2023. The accused was charged with theft of valuable transformer parts from an industrial factory, with evidence of previous similar criminal offenses and material recovered from his possession. The court found the crime to be serious in nature and held that bail release was unjustified given the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge (E.c. Act)

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    hearing

    Spl. Judge (E.c. Act)

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 490/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (E.C. Act), Etawah rejected the bail application of Bachu Singh Balmiki in case FIR No. 09/2026 under sections 303(2), 317(2), 307, and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code 2023. The accused was charged with theft of valuable transformer parts from an industrial factory, with evidence of previous similar criminal offenses and material recovered from his possession. The court found the crime to be serious in nature and held that bail release was unjustified given the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case