RAKESH BABU URF RAKESH KUMAR vs State of UP Advocate - DGC Criminal — 488/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80(2). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPEW010015882026

Filing Number

1510/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

488/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-Spl. Judge (E.c. Act)

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

278

Police Station

SAIPHAI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80(2)
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH BABU URF RAKESH KUMAR

    Adv. SPS RANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP Advocate - DGC Criminal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Aplication for processView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Special Judge (E.C. Act), Etawah denied bail to 62-year-old Rakesh Babu in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 85 and 80(2), and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant was accused of abetting the death of his daughter-in-law within eight months of her marriage in April 2025, allegedly due to dowry harassment. The court found the prosecution's allegations credible regarding abnormal circumstances surrounding the victim's death on November 27, 2025, and rejected the bail application as the crime was serious in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge (E.c. Act)

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    hearing

    Spl. Judge (E.c. Act)

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 488/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Special Judge (E.C. Act), Etawah denied bail to 62-year-old Rakesh Babu in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 85 and 80(2), and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant was accused of abetting the death of his daughter-in-law within eight months of her marriage in April 2025, allegedly due to dowry harassment. The court found the prosecution's allegations credible regarding abnormal circumstances surrounding the victim's death on November 27, 2025, and rejected the bail application as the crime was serious in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case