NITIN GUPTA vs State of UP Advocate - DGC Criminal — 463/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(20. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPEW010015472026

Filing Number

1474/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

463/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-Spl. Judge (E.c. Act)

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

192

Police Station

KOTWALI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITIN GUPTA

    Adv. SUBODH KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP Advocate - DGC Criminal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Aplication for processView PDF

    The Special Judge (E.C. Act), Etawah rejected the bail application of Nitin Gupta (39 years), accused of GST fraud under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), and 340(2). The accused allegedly created bogus firms and fraudulently claimed ₹11.86 crore in Input Tax Credit (ITC) using fake invoices without actual goods purchase, causing significant revenue loss. The court found the charges serious and dismissed bail, noting procedural irregularities in arrest documentation supported prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge (E.c. Act)

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 463/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (E.C. Act), Etawah rejected the bail application of Nitin Gupta (39 years), accused of GST fraud under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), and 340(2). The accused allegedly created bogus firms and fraudulently claimed ₹11.86 crore in Input Tax Credit (ITC) using fake invoices without actual goods purchase, causing significant revenue loss. The court found the charges serious and dismissed bail, noting procedural irregularities in arrest documentation supported prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case