ATUL KUMAR URF JEETU vs State of UP Advocate - DGC Criminal — 450/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(10,3950. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPEW010014972026

Filing Number

1427/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

450/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge/Regular Etawah

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

4

Police Station

BASREHAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(10,3950
Arms Act Section 3/25/27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ATUL KUMAR URF JEETU

    Adv. ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH RAJPUT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP Advocate - DGC Criminal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    copy of JudgementView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the bail petition of Atul Kumar (alias Jittu) accused of murdering the complainant's son by shooting him on January 12, 2026, in Itawa district. The court found serious charges against the accused under BNS Sections 103(1) and 3(5) and the Arms Act, with evidence including recovery of the weapon, postmortem report confirming firearm injury as cause of death, and the accused's own confession during police custody. The bail was denied as the crime was grave in nature and the co-accused's bail had already been rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge/Regular Etawah

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 450/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the bail petition of Atul Kumar (alias Jittu) accused of murdering the complainant's son by shooting him on January 12, 2026, in Itawa district. The court found serious charges against the accused under BNS Sections 103(1) and 3(5) and the Arms Act, with evidence including recovery of the weapon, postmortem report confirming firearm injury as cause of death, and the accused's own confession during police custody. The bail was denied as the crime was grave in nature and the co-accused's bail had already been rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case