ATUL KUMAR URF JEETU vs State of UP Advocate - DGC Criminal — 450/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(10,3950. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 07th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPEW010014972026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1427/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

450/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge/Regular Etawah

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

FIR Details

FIR Number

4

Police Station

BASREHAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(10,3950
Arms Act Section 3/25/27

Petitioner(s)

ATUL KUMAR URF JEETU

Adv. ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH RAJPUT

Respondent(s)

State of UP Advocate - DGC Criminal

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl. District Judge/Regular Etawah

07-03-2026

Disposed

26-02-2026

hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
copy of Judgement

Summary The court rejected the bail petition of Atul Kumar (alias Jittu) accused of murdering the complainant's son by shooting him on January 12, 2026, in Itawa district. The court found serious charges against the accused under BNS Sections 103(1) and 3(5) and the Arms Act, with evidence including recovery of the weapon, postmortem report confirming firearm injury as cause of death, and the accused's own confession during police custody. The bail was denied as the crime was grave in nature and the co-accused's bail had already been rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the bail petition of Atul Kumar (alias Jittu) accused of murdering the complainant's son by shooting him on January 12, 2026, in Itawa district. The court found serious charges against the accused under BNS Sections 103(1) and 3(5) and the Arms Act, with evidence including recovery of the weapon, postmortem report confirming firearm injury as cause of death, and the accused's own confession during police custody. The bail was denied as the crime was grave in nature and the co-accused's bail had already been rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case