Ashu Yadav vs Priyanku — 1618/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.
Warrant or Summons Criminal Case
CNR: UPET120024712025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2301/2025
Filing Date
24-09-2025
Registration No
1618/2025
Registration Date
10-10-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Jalesar
Judge
1-Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECT
FIR Details
Police Station
AWAGARH
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashu Yadav
Respondent(s)
Priyanku
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
Disposed
Further Order
Further Order
Further Order
Further Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Further Order | |
| 27-02-2026 | Further Order | |
| 27-01-2026 | Further Order | |
| 05-01-2026 | Further Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Civil Court (Jalaun, Etah) dismissed the petition filed by the complainant (Ashu Yadav) in the absence of the defendant on 19.03.2026. The court found that the case had been referred for mediation on 24.09.2025, and a settlement agreement was reached between the parties. Since the complainant failed to appear on multiple dates and showed no further interest in pursuing the case, the court concluded there was insufficient grounds to summon the defendant, and accordingly dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Civil Court (Jalaun, Etah) dismissed the petition filed by the complainant (Ashu Yadav) in the absence of the defendant on 19.03.2026. The court found that the case had been referred for mediation on 24.09.2025, and a settlement agreement was reached between the parties. Since the complainant failed to appear on multiple dates and showed no further interest in pursuing the case, the court concluded there was insufficient grounds to summon the defendant, and accordingly dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts