Vinod Kumar vs Fagundas — 54/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section NA. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 04th April 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: UPET120006262025
Filing Number
74/2025
Filing Date
03-Apr-2025
Registration No
54/2025
Registration Date
03-Apr-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Jalesar
Judge
1-Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
Decision Date
04-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 24-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vinod Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Fagundas
-
2.Ramshankar
-
3.Ganga Prasad
-
4.Satyaprakash
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court dismissed Civil Suit No. 54/2025 (Vinod Kumar vs. Fagun Das) for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's persistent absence despite multiple hearings and a final notice issued on 22.01.2026. The court found that the plaintiff's continued non-appearance demonstrated lack of interest in pursuing the case and ordered dismissal in absentia with the record filed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
10-Mar-2026
Appearance
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
22-Jan-2026
Appearance
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
26-Nov-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
06-Oct-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
10-Sep-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
30-Jul-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
04-Jul-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
09-May-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
03-May-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
18-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 54/2025
The court dismissed Civil Suit No. 54/2025 (Vinod Kumar vs. Fagun Das) for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's persistent absence despite multiple hearings and a final notice issued on 22.01.2026. The court found that the plaintiff's continued non-appearance demonstrated lack of interest in pursuing the case and ordered dismissal in absentia with the record filed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts