State vs Shrikrishna — 61/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,452,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th March 2026.
Warrant or Summons Criminal Case
CNR: UPET110002102024
e-Filing Number
16-02-2024
Filing Number
185/2024
Filing Date
16-Feb-2024
Registration No
61/2024
Registration Date
16-Feb-2024
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division, Jalesar
Judge
1-Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 24-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
243
Police Station
JALESAR
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shrikrishna
-
2.Dinesh
-
3.Ritik Alias Ritikroshan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted the three accused (Shrikrishna, Dinesh, and Ritik alias Ritkiroshan) of charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, and 452, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while the main witness (PW-01) supported the allegations, the second witness (PW-02) contradicted the narrative and was declared hostile, rendering the prosecution's case unreliable and insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
25-Mar-2026
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
24-Mar-2026
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
10-Mar-2026
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
23-Feb-2026
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
18-Feb-2026
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
10-Feb-2026
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
16-Dec-2025
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
02-Dec-2025
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
18-Nov-2025
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
15-Oct-2025
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
01-Sep-2025
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
07-Aug-2025
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
24-Jun-2025
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
10-Jun-2025
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
03-Jun-2025
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
28-May-2025
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
14-May-2025
Charge
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
25-Apr-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
26-Mar-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
18-Feb-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
09-Jan-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
07-Dec-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
05-Nov-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
30-Sep-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
30-Aug-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
02-Aug-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
25-Jun-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
04-Jun-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
08-May-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
20-Apr-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
09-Apr-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaleshar - Etah
-
06-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 61/2024
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted the three accused (Shrikrishna, Dinesh, and Ritik alias Ritkiroshan) of charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, and 452, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while the main witness (PW-01) supported the allegations, the second witness (PW-02) contradicted the narrative and was declared hostile, rendering the prosecution's case unreliable and insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts