Munnalal vs UP Government by Collector Etah — 219/2025

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Appeal

CNR: UPET010074492025

Filing Number

576/2025

Filing Date

17-Nov-2025

Registration No

219/2025

Registration Date

17-Nov-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Munnalal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UP Government by Collector Etah

  2. 2.Gram Sabha Mauja by Gram Pradhan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Janpad Nyayalaya (Etah) court partially allowed the petitioner's appeal against an order dated 14-08-2025. The court found that the appellant did not receive proper notice before the original order was issued on 15-09-2025, making the proceedings defective. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter to the lower authority, directing it to issue a fresh notice to the appellant and provide an opportunity for a fair hearing before passing any order, while upholding the appellant's right to appeal under Section 5 of the relevant regulation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District And Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District And Sessions Judge

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District And Sessions Judge

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 219/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Janpad Nyayalaya (Etah) court partially allowed the petitioner's appeal against an order dated 14-08-2025. The court found that the appellant did not receive proper notice before the original order was issued on 15-09-2025, making the proceedings defective. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter to the lower authority, directing it to issue a fresh notice to the appellant and provide an opportunity for a fair hearing before passing any order, while upholding the appellant's right to appeal under Section 5 of the relevant regulation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case