Nisha Singh and Others vs Archana Devi — 207/2025

Case under Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Section 8. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th April 2026.

Misc. Civil Cases

CNR: UPET010069462025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

533/2025

Filing Date

30-10-2025

Registration No

207/2025

Registration Date

31-10-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

HINDU MINORITY AND GUARDIANSHIP ACT Section 8

Petitioner(s)

Nisha Singh and Others

Respondent(s)

Archana Devi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

09-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Order/ Judgement

07-04-2026

Order/ Judgement

31-03-2026

Hearing

10-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The Additional District Judge, Etah, allowed the application by Smt. Nisha Singh to mortgage her minor sons' 2/3rd share in inherited property to Canara Bank. The court held that Nisha Singh is the natural guardian of the minors under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, and that the mortgage serves both legal necessity and evident advantage by preserving the family business (valued at ₹70 Lakhs) that provides for the minors' education and maintenance. The permission was granted subject to conditions: funds must be used strictly for business operations, the guardian must prevent willful default, and the property cannot be sold without separate court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional District Judge, Etah, allowed the application by Smt. Nisha Singh to mortgage her minor sons' 2/3rd share in inherited property to Canara Bank. The court held that Nisha Singh is the natural guardian of the minors under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, and that the mortgage serves both legal necessity and evident advantage by preserving the family business (valued at ₹70 Lakhs) that provides for the minors' education and maintenance. The permission was granted subject to conditions: funds must be used strictly for business operations, the guardian must prevent willful default, and the property cannot be sold without separate court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case