Nisha Singh and Others vs Archana Devi — 207/2025
Case under Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Section 8. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th April 2026.
Misc. Civil Cases
CNR: UPET010069462025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
533/2025
Filing Date
30-10-2025
Registration No
207/2025
Registration Date
31-10-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nisha Singh and Others
Respondent(s)
Archana Devi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 07-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 31-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional District Judge, Etah, allowed the application by Smt. Nisha Singh to mortgage her minor sons' 2/3rd share in inherited property to Canara Bank. The court held that Nisha Singh is the natural guardian of the minors under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, and that the mortgage serves both legal necessity and evident advantage by preserving the family business (valued at ₹70 Lakhs) that provides for the minors' education and maintenance. The permission was granted subject to conditions: funds must be used strictly for business operations, the guardian must prevent willful default, and the property cannot be sold without separate court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional District Judge, Etah, allowed the application by Smt. Nisha Singh to mortgage her minor sons' 2/3rd share in inherited property to Canara Bank. The court held that Nisha Singh is the natural guardian of the minors under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, and that the mortgage serves both legal necessity and evident advantage by preserving the family business (valued at ₹70 Lakhs) that provides for the minors' education and maintenance. The permission was granted subject to conditions: funds must be used strictly for business operations, the guardian must prevent willful default, and the property cannot be sold without separate court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts