Anand Kumar Jain vs Hridyesh — 166/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 16th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Cases
CNR: UPET010056662025
Filing Number
434/2025
Filing Date
03-Sep-2025
Registration No
166/2025
Registration Date
03-Sep-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anand Kumar Jain
Adv. Himanshu Kulshrestha
-
2.Poonam jain
-
3.Prateek Aamoriya
-
4.Nidhi Aamoriya
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hridyesh
-
2.Sarvesh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The District Judge of Etah allowed the applicant's reinstatement petition (4,1) with a fine of ₹1,000. The court found that the appellant's absence on the scheduled hearing date (02.09.2025) was not willful negligence but resulted from unavoidable circumstances—the advocate was present in court but attending to another senior advocate's case proceedings. The court reinstated Original Appeal No. 13/2025 and rescheduled it for hearing on 06.04.2026, finding the explanation reasonable and consistent with judicial practice regarding advocate availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Nov-2025
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
30-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 166/2025
Court Decision Summary The District Judge of Etah allowed the applicant's reinstatement petition (4,1) with a fine of ₹1,000. The court found that the appellant's absence on the scheduled hearing date (02.09.2025) was not willful negligence but resulted from unavoidable circumstances—the advocate was present in court but attending to another senior advocate's case proceedings. The court reinstated Original Appeal No. 13/2025 and rescheduled it for hearing on 06.04.2026, finding the explanation reasonable and consistent with judicial practice regarding advocate availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts