Dhyanpal vs Sangeeta Gupta — 62/2025
Case under Provincial Small Cause Courts Act Section 25. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 24th March 2026.
Civil Revision.
CNR: UPET010053052025
Filing Number
393/2025
Filing Date
18-Aug-2025
Registration No
62/2025
Registration Date
18-Aug-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dhyanpal
Adv. Sanjay Varshney
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sangeeta Gupta
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The District Judge of Agra dismissed the petitioner's revision petition challenging the lower court's July 9, 2024 order that rejected his application to set aside a one-sided decree in a 2018 property dispute (Civil Suit No. 2/2018). The court held that the petitioner failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of Section 17 of the Provincial Small Causes Act—specifically, he neither deposited the decretal amount in cash nor obtained prior court permission, submitting only a vehicle registration certificate as security, which was legally insufficient. The court upheld the lower court's order, finding no legal defect or excess of jurisdiction, and rejected the revision petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 62/2025
Summary The District Judge of Agra dismissed the petitioner's revision petition challenging the lower court's July 9, 2024 order that rejected his application to set aside a one-sided decree in a 2018 property dispute (Civil Suit No. 2/2018). The court held that the petitioner failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of Section 17 of the Provincial Small Causes Act—specifically, he neither deposited the decretal amount in cash nor obtained prior court permission, submitting only a vehicle registration certificate as security, which was legally insufficient. The court upheld the lower court's order, finding no legal defect or excess of jurisdiction, and rejected the revision petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts