Poonam Agarwal vs Om Prakash — 293/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: UPET010049902025
Filing Number
4660/2025
Filing Date
01-Aug-2025
Registration No
293/2025
Registration Date
02-Aug-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
9-Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
999
Police Station
KOTWALI NAGAR
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Poonam Agarwal
Adv. Gyanendra Gautam
Respondent(s)
-
1.Om Prakash
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Revisional Court set aside the trial court's summoning order in a stock-broker fraud case, finding it legally defective on three grounds: (1) it was a non-speaking order that failed to specify the criminal charges against the accused, violating Supreme Court precedent; (2) the magistrate ignored conclusive documentary evidence (bank records, dishonoured cheques) showing the complainant actually recovered more funds than deposited, indicating no criminal misappropriation; and (3) the dispute is inherently civil/commercial in nature governed by SEBI regulations, not criminal law. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
09-Apr-2026
For Disposal
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
21-Feb-2026
Arguments
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
11-Feb-2026
Arguments
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
30-Jan-2026
Arguments
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
20-Dec-2025
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Arguments
District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 293/2025
Summary The Revisional Court set aside the trial court's summoning order in a stock-broker fraud case, finding it legally defective on three grounds: (1) it was a non-speaking order that failed to specify the criminal charges against the accused, violating Supreme Court precedent; (2) the magistrate ignored conclusive documentary evidence (bank records, dishonoured cheques) showing the complainant actually recovered more funds than deposited, indicating no criminal misappropriation; and (3) the dispute is inherently civil/commercial in nature governed by SEBI regulations, not criminal law. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts