Hariom vs Uma Devi — 269/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPET010043932025

Filing Number

4092/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

269/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

9-Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

BAGWALA

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hariom

    Adv. Sanjeev Kumar Yadav

  2. 2.Shivdutt

  3. 3.Mohshri

  4. 4.Avnish Kumar

  5. 5.Avdhesh

  6. 6.Saroj Alias Nanni

  7. 7.Kayam Singh Alias Bhure

  8. 8.Ramratan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uma Devi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court partially allowed the revision petition, quashing the summoning order against six of eight accused family members (mother-in-law, three brothers-in-law, sister-in-law, and uncle-in-law) on grounds that allegations against them were vague, omnibus, and lacked specific attribution of roles or acts. However, the court upheld the summons against the husband (Hariom) and father-in-law (Shivdutt) for dowry harassment under Section 498-A IPC, finding specific allegations regarding demands for a gold chain and motorcycle merited trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

  7. 19-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

  11. 12-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District And Sessions Judge

  12. 18-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District And Sessions Judge

  13. 06-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District And Sessions Judge

  14. 18-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District And Sessions Judge

  15. 13-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District And Sessions Judge

  16. 06-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    District And Sessions Judge

  17. 04-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    District And Sessions Judge

  18. 26-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District And Sessions Judge

  19. 25-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District And Sessions Judge

  20. 08-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District And Sessions Judge

  21. 21-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    District And Sessions Judge

  22. 25-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 269/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court partially allowed the revision petition, quashing the summoning order against six of eight accused family members (mother-in-law, three brothers-in-law, sister-in-law, and uncle-in-law) on grounds that allegations against them were vague, omnibus, and lacked specific attribution of roles or acts. However, the court upheld the summons against the husband (Hariom) and father-in-law (Shivdutt) for dowry harassment under Section 498-A IPC, finding specific allegations regarding demands for a gold chain and motorcycle merited trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case