State vs Yogendra alias Pappu — 346/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238(a),3(5),61(2)(a). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: UPET010025392025

e-Filing Number

06-05-2025

Filing Number

2308/2025

Filing Date

06-May-2025

Registration No

346/2025

Registration Date

06-May-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

429

Police Station

JAITHRA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238(a),3(5),61(2)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yogendra alias Pappu

  2. 2.Manoj alias Bhure

  3. 3.Pradeep

  4. 4.Shivkumar alias Yogesh

  5. 5.Sogesh alias Neksa

  6. 6.Nitesh alias Nitanesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court acquitted six accused persons of murder charges due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish a circumstantial chain proving the death of Munesh Kumar was a premeditated homicide rather than an accident. While recovery of a pipe and motorcycle, along with confessional statements, suggested involvement, the absence of direct eyewitness testimony, credible motive evidence, and logical nexus between circumstances meant the accused could not be convicted beyond reasonable doubt. The judge applied the legal principle that in circumstantial evidence cases, all facts must conclusively point to guilt without alternative explanation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District And Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District And Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Statement U/S 313

    District And Sessions Judge

  7. 03-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  8. 02-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  9. 01-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  10. 31-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  11. 30-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  12. 28-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  13. 26-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  14. 25-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  15. 23-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  16. 20-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  17. 19-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  18. 18-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  19. 16-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  20. 13-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  21. 10-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

  22. 09-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

  23. 21-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

  24. 06-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

  25. 02-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

  26. 15-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

  27. 14-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

  28. 13-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

  29. 16-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

  30. 25-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

  31. 01-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

  32. 25-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

  33. 05-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 01

  34. 12-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District And Sessions Judge

  35. 31-May-2025

    Appearance

    District And Sessions Judge

  36. 21-May-2025

    Appearance

    District And Sessions Judge

  37. 07-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 06-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 346/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court acquitted six accused persons of murder charges due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish a circumstantial chain proving the death of Munesh Kumar was a premeditated homicide rather than an accident. While recovery of a pipe and motorcycle, along with confessional statements, suggested involvement, the absence of direct eyewitness testimony, credible motive evidence, and logical nexus between circumstances meant the accused could not be convicted beyond reasonable doubt. The judge applied the legal principle that in circumstantial evidence cases, all facts must conclusively point to guilt without alternative explanation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case