Vishesh vs State — 425/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395,412,120B. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPET010010832026

Filing Number

952/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

425/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

10-Special Judge Dacoity Affected Area

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

33

Police Station

MALAWAN

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 395,412,120B
The Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas Act, 1983 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vishesh

    Adv. Ram Khilali Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to the accused (approximately 30 years old) in a case involving charges under Sections 395, 412, 120B IPC and the Dacoity Abolition Act, arising from a truck theft incident on 25-02-2018. The accused was ordered to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 and provide an equal security deposit, subject to five conditions including regular court attendance, cooperation in the investigation, non-interference with witnesses, and abstaining from further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge Dacoity Affected Area

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 425/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to the accused (approximately 30 years old) in a case involving charges under Sections 395, 412, 120B IPC and the Dacoity Abolition Act, arising from a truck theft incident on 25-02-2018. The accused was ordered to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 and provide an equal security deposit, subject to five conditions including regular court attendance, cooperation in the investigation, non-interference with witnesses, and abstaining from further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case