Hemant Lodhi Alias Hemant Kumar vs State — 415/2026

Case under Uttar Pradesh Public Examinations (prevention Unfair Means) Act, 1998 Section 7,13(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPET010010222026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

897/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

415/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

84

Police Station

KOTWALI DEHAT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

UTTAR PRADESH PUBLIC EXAMINATIONS (PREVENTION UNFAIR MEANS) ACT, 1998 Section 7,13(3)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),336(3),337,340(2)

Petitioner(s)

Hemant Lodhi Alias Hemant Kumar

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge

13-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Hearing

07-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary: The Sessions Court at Etah granted bail to Hemant Lodhi (26), accused of impersonating another candidate (Mohammad Ayub) during a high school science examination on 25.02.2026, in violation of BNS sections 319(2), 336(3), 337, 340(2) and UP Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Ordinance 2024. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the serious nature of the offense (punishable by 2-10 years imprisonment), considering the accused had no prior criminal history and had been in jail custody since 26.02.2026. The accused was released on bail of Rs. 50,000 personal bond with similar surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Court at Etah granted bail to Hemant Lodhi (26), accused of impersonating another candidate (Mohammad Ayub) during a high school science examination on 25.02.2026, in violation of BNS sections 319(2), 336(3), 337, 340(2) and UP Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Ordinance 2024. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the serious nature of the offense (punishable by 2-10 years imprisonment), considering the accused had no prior criminal history and had been in jail custody since 26.02.2026. The accused was released on bail of Rs. 50,000 personal bond with similar surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case