State vs Sachin Kumar — 146/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 07th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPET010010162026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
891/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
146/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
FIR Details
FIR Number
226
Police Station
BAGWALA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. DGC Crl.
Respondent(s)
Sachin Kumar
Rampoot alias Ramkishor
Nanhilali alias Nanhi Devi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Defence Evidence
Statement U/S 313
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 31-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 28-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 26-03-2026 | Statement U/S 313 |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Eta acquitted three accused individuals (Sachin Kumar, Rampoot, and Nanhi Devi) charged under BNS Sections 80(2)/85 and the Dowry Prohibition Act for the death of the victim, Sarita. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that the accused demanded additional dowry or harassed the victim before her death, as the prosecution's own key witnesses (victim's parents and brother) contradicted the charges during testimony, and medical evidence indicated the death was consistent with suicide by hanging. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Eta acquitted three accused individuals (Sachin Kumar, Rampoot, and Nanhi Devi) charged under BNS Sections 80(2)/85 and the Dowry Prohibition Act for the death of the victim, Sarita. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that the accused demanded additional dowry or harassed the victim before her death, as the prosecution's own key witnesses (victim's parents and brother) contradicted the charges during testimony, and medical evidence indicated the death was consistent with suicide by hanging. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts