State vs Sachin Kumar — 146/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 07th April 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: UPET010010162026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

891/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

146/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

FIR Details

FIR Number

226

Police Station

BAGWALA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85
DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. DGC Crl.

Respondent(s)

Sachin Kumar

Rampoot alias Ramkishor

Nanhilali alias Nanhi Devi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge

07-04-2026

Disposed

31-03-2026

Judgement

30-03-2026

Arguments

28-03-2026

Defence Evidence

26-03-2026

Statement U/S 313

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Eta acquitted three accused individuals (Sachin Kumar, Rampoot, and Nanhi Devi) charged under BNS Sections 80(2)/85 and the Dowry Prohibition Act for the death of the victim, Sarita. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that the accused demanded additional dowry or harassed the victim before her death, as the prosecution's own key witnesses (victim's parents and brother) contradicted the charges during testimony, and medical evidence indicated the death was consistent with suicide by hanging. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Eta acquitted three accused individuals (Sachin Kumar, Rampoot, and Nanhi Devi) charged under BNS Sections 80(2)/85 and the Dowry Prohibition Act for the death of the victim, Sarita. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that the accused demanded additional dowry or harassed the victim before her death, as the prosecution's own key witnesses (victim's parents and brother) contradicted the charges during testimony, and medical evidence indicated the death was consistent with suicide by hanging. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case