Sonu Singh vs State — 421/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPET010010042026

Filing Number

882/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

421/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

9-Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

174

Police Station

NIDHOLI KALAN

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)d,3(1)dh

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sonu Singh

    Adv. Subhash Arya (Baboo)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Special Judge granted bail to Sonu Singh, accused of physical assault and use of abusive language under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court found the FIR was filed with unexplained two-day delay, assault allegations lacked medical corroboration, the applicant had no criminal history, and co-accused were already granted bail, warranting parity. Bail was granted with conditions including furnishing ₹20,000 surety and standard bail restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 421/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge granted bail to Sonu Singh, accused of physical assault and use of abusive language under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court found the FIR was filed with unexplained two-day delay, assault allegations lacked medical corroboration, the applicant had no criminal history, and co-accused were already granted bail, warranting parity. Bail was granted with conditions including furnishing ₹20,000 surety and standard bail restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case