Rinku Sagar vs State — 402/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 69,351(3),61(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPET010009852026

Filing Number

865/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

402/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

69

Police Station

JALESAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 69,351(3),61(2)
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rinku Sagar

    Adv. Ankit Jain

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Eta, rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Rinku Sagar, accused of rape, sexual exploitation, and dowry-related offenses under IPC Sections 69, 351(3), 61(2) BNS and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found credible allegations that the accused lured the victim with false marriage promises, sexually assaulted her multiple times, demanded dowry, and threatened to circulate obscene photos on social media, warranting denial of bail to prevent witness intimidation and ensure trial fairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District And Sessions Judge

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Sessions Judge

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Sessions Judge

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 402/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Eta, rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Rinku Sagar, accused of rape, sexual exploitation, and dowry-related offenses under IPC Sections 69, 351(3), 61(2) BNS and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found credible allegations that the accused lured the victim with false marriage promises, sexually assaulted her multiple times, demanded dowry, and threatened to circulate obscene photos on social media, warranting denial of bail to prevent witness intimidation and ensure trial fairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case