Rinku Sagar vs State — 402/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 69,351(3),61(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 01st April 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPET010009852026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

865/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

402/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

69

Police Station

JALESAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 69,351(3),61(2)
DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

Rinku Sagar

Adv. Ankit Jain

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge

01-04-2026

Disposed

28-03-2026

Hearing

20-03-2026

Hearing

16-03-2026

Hearing

10-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Copy of Order

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Eta, rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Rinku Sagar, accused of rape, sexual exploitation, and dowry-related offenses under IPC Sections 69, 351(3), 61(2) BNS and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found credible allegations that the accused lured the victim with false marriage promises, sexually assaulted her multiple times, demanded dowry, and threatened to circulate obscene photos on social media, warranting denial of bail to prevent witness intimidation and ensure trial fairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Eta, rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Rinku Sagar, accused of rape, sexual exploitation, and dowry-related offenses under IPC Sections 69, 351(3), 61(2) BNS and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found credible allegations that the accused lured the victim with false marriage promises, sexually assaulted her multiple times, demanded dowry, and threatened to circulate obscene photos on social media, warranting denial of bail to prevent witness intimidation and ensure trial fairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case