Satyapal Alias Chotu and Others vs State — 404/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),132,190,109,115(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPET010009782026
Filing Number
858/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
404/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
9-Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 24-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
110
Police Station
JASRATHPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Satyapal Alias Chotu and Others
Adv. Ved Pal Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to Satyapal alias Chhotu and Munnalal in a case involving alleged rioting and firearms use during a group clash on October 22, 2025. The judge found that despite serious charges under BNS sections 191, 132, 190, 109, and 115, the lack of injuries to police personnel, the principle of parity with co-accused already granted bail, and the absence of substantial evidence of flight risk or evidence tampering warranted bail with stringent conditions including ₹50,000 personal bond, two sureties, court appearance, and full investigation cooperation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 404/2026
Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to Satyapal alias Chhotu and Munnalal in a case involving alleged rioting and firearms use during a group clash on October 22, 2025. The judge found that despite serious charges under BNS sections 191, 132, 190, 109, and 115, the lack of injuries to police personnel, the principle of parity with co-accused already granted bail, and the absence of substantial evidence of flight risk or evidence tampering warranted bail with stringent conditions including ₹50,000 personal bond, two sureties, court appearance, and full investigation cooperation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts