Ehsaan Khan and Others vs State — 389/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),333,351(2),353(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPET010009532026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
839/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
389/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
9-Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
107
Police Station
JASRATHPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ehsaan Khan and Others
Adv. Thakur Manoj Kumar Singh Rathoud
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ehsan Khan and Israr Khan, who were accused of caste-based harassment, physical assault, and verbal abuse against a Scheduled Caste complainant under the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989. The court found a prima facie case existed based on specific allegations of caste-based slurs and violence, and applied Section 18 of the SC/ST Act, which creates a statutory bar against anticipatory bail. The court also considered Ehsan Khan's extensive criminal history (20+ cases) as a significant factor against granting discretionary relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ehsan Khan and Israr Khan, who were accused of caste-based harassment, physical assault, and verbal abuse against a Scheduled Caste complainant under the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989. The court found a prima facie case existed based on specific allegations of caste-based slurs and violence, and applied Section 18 of the SC/ST Act, which creates a statutory bar against anticipatory bail. The court also considered Ehsan Khan's extensive criminal history (20+ cases) as a significant factor against granting discretionary relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts