Ehsaan Khan and Others vs State — 389/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),333,351(2),353(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPET010009532026
Filing Number
839/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
389/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
9-Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 24-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
107
Police Station
JASRATHPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ehsaan Khan and Others
Adv. Thakur Manoj Kumar Singh Rathoud
Respondent(s)
-
1.State
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ehsan Khan and Israr Khan, who were accused of caste-based harassment, physical assault, and verbal abuse against a Scheduled Caste complainant under the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989. The court found a prima facie case existed based on specific allegations of caste-based slurs and violence, and applied Section 18 of the SC/ST Act, which creates a statutory bar against anticipatory bail. The court also considered Ehsan Khan's extensive criminal history (20+ cases) as a significant factor against granting discretionary relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 389/2026
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ehsan Khan and Israr Khan, who were accused of caste-based harassment, physical assault, and verbal abuse against a Scheduled Caste complainant under the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989. The court found a prima facie case existed based on specific allegations of caste-based slurs and violence, and applied Section 18 of the SC/ST Act, which creates a statutory bar against anticipatory bail. The court also considered Ehsan Khan's extensive criminal history (20+ cases) as a significant factor against granting discretionary relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts