Anil Kumar Yadav vs State — 374/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 4/25. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPET010009242026

Filing Number

815/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

374/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

9-Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

342

Police Station

KOTWALI NAGAR

Year

2012

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 4/25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anil Kumar Yadav

    Adv. Rakesh Chandra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge granted bail to Anil Kumar Yadav in a Case Crime No. 342/2012 under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act, finding that his non-appearance after February 17, 2025 was justified by his judicial custody in an unrelated case rather than deliberate absconding. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 and one surety of equal amount, along with standard restrictions on court appearances, evidence tampering, and criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 374/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge granted bail to Anil Kumar Yadav in a Case Crime No. 342/2012 under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act, finding that his non-appearance after February 17, 2025 was justified by his judicial custody in an unrelated case rather than deliberate absconding. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 and one surety of equal amount, along with standard restrictions on court appearances, evidence tampering, and criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case