Sarita Alias Nisha and Others vs State — 324/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,115(2),351(3),191(2),109(1),309(6). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPET010007742026

Filing Number

680/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

324/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

10-Special Judge Dacoity Affected Area

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

148

Police Station

SAKRAULI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,115(2),351(3),191(2),109(1),309(6)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sarita Alias Nisha and Others

    Adv. Bijendra Pal Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Special Judge (SC/ST Division) in Etah, Uttar Pradesh, rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by four applicants (Sarita/Nisha, Kanta Devi, Yatendrapal/Bantu, and Anshu) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 352, 115(2), 351(3), 191(2), 109(1), and 309(6). The court found sufficient grounds for the allegations of group assault, attempted strangulation, and causing grievous injury, and determined that the applicants' claims of false prosecution due to village factionalism lacked merit based on available evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge Dacoity Affected Area

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order/Disposal

    Special Judge Dacoity Affected Area

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge Dacoity Affected Area

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 324/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Special Judge (SC/ST Division) in Etah, Uttar Pradesh, rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by four applicants (Sarita/Nisha, Kanta Devi, Yatendrapal/Bantu, and Anshu) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 352, 115(2), 351(3), 191(2), 109(1), and 309(6). The court found sufficient grounds for the allegations of group assault, attempted strangulation, and causing grievous injury, and determined that the applicants' claims of false prosecution due to village factionalism lacked merit based on available evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case