Abhaypal Singh vs State — 323/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPET010007192026

Filing Number

627/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

323/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

9-Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(2)
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(2)va

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Abhaypal Singh

    Adv. Ved Pal Singh

  2. 2.Harveer Singh alias Kanhaiya

  3. 3.Yadavendra Urph Banjara

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge granted bail to three accused persons (Abhaypal Singh, Harvir Singh, and Yadvendra) in an SC/ST Act case involving alleged assault stemming from a trivial dispute over disposal of a snack bowl. The court found the case fit for bail considering the FIR delay, lack of independent witnesses, absence of caste-based slurs in the report, and the accused's clean criminal records, imposing standard bail conditions including personal bond of ₹20,000 each and restrictions on witness tampering and foreign travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 323/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge granted bail to three accused persons (Abhaypal Singh, Harvir Singh, and Yadvendra) in an SC/ST Act case involving alleged assault stemming from a trivial dispute over disposal of a snack bowl. The court found the case fit for bail considering the FIR delay, lack of independent witnesses, absence of caste-based slurs in the report, and the accused's clean criminal records, imposing standard bail conditions including personal bond of ₹20,000 each and restrictions on witness tampering and foreign travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case