State vs Premchandra Naai Advocate - Sushil Babu — 7/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
Cri. Case
CNR: UPET010006602017
Filing Number
497/2017
Filing Date
19-01-2017
Registration No
7/2017
Registration Date
30-01-2017
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
9-Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
202
Police Station
MALAWAN
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. ADGC Crl.
Respondent(s)
Premchandra Naai Advocate - Sushil Babu
Kanti Devi
Adv. Sushil Babu
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Special Judge Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Act
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Statement U/S 313
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-01-2026 | Statement U/S 313 |
| 05-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary Case: State of Uttar Pradesh v. Premchandra Nai & Smt. Kanti Devi (Special Judge, SC/ST PA Act, Etah) Decision: The court acquitted both accused of charges under Section 323 IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989. The judgment found fatal contradictions in eyewitness testimonies, a critical seven-day delay in FIR registration, and medical evidence completely contradicting the alleged use of sharp weapons, rendering the prosecution case unreliable beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary Case: State of Uttar Pradesh v. Premchandra Nai & Smt. Kanti Devi (Special Judge, SC/ST PA Act, Etah) Decision: The court acquitted both accused of charges under Section 323 IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989. The judgment found fatal contradictions in eyewitness testimonies, a critical seven-day delay in FIR registration, and medical evidence completely contradicting the alleged use of sharp weapons, rendering the prosecution case unreliable beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts