Shyamveer Singh vs Hari Prasad — 27/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPET010005142026

Filing Number

446/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

27/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 03

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

265

Police Station

NIDHOLI KALAN

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shyamveer Singh

    Adv. Rohit Pundhir

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hari Prasad

  2. 2.Kamlesh

  3. 3.Kamal Singh

  4. 4.Vinay

  5. 5.Sachin

  6. 6.Vikas

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Additional District Judge at Etah accepted the criminal revision petition and set aside the trial court's order dated 29-05-2019 that had rejected the applicant's protest petition. The court found that the trial court had mechanically dismissed the protest petition without properly evaluating the evidence on record or providing reasoned grounds for accepting the final police report, thereby failing to exercise its judicial discretion. The court directed the trial court to rehear the protest petition and pass a lawful order in light of the decision, with the applicant required to appear on 18-04-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 03

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 03

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 03

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District Judge at Etah accepted the criminal revision petition and set aside the trial court's order dated 29-05-2019 that had rejected the applicant's protest petition. The court found that the trial court had mechanically dismissed the protest petition without properly evaluating the evidence on record or providing reasoned grounds for accepting the final police report, thereby failing to exercise its judicial discretion. The court directed the trial court to rehear the protest petition and pass a lawful order in light of the decision, with the applicant required to appear on 18-04-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case