Udairaj Singh and Others vs State — 159/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPET010003772026

Filing Number

325/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

159/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

10-Special Judge Dacoity Affected Area

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 395

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Udairaj Singh and Others

    Adv. Devendra Singh Solanki

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Special Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by seven police officers (Udayraj Singh, Sunheri Lal, Samay Singh, Umendra Singh, Raj Narayan Singh, Umesh Upadhyay, and Awara Hussain) accused under Section 395 IPC (dacoity) in connection with an alleged looting of ₹48,000 and jewelry from a complainant's house in 2000. The court found insufficient grounds for anticipatory bail, noting that the case had been pending for 24 years and that the complainant had failed to produce independent eyewitnesses in court to substantiate serious allegations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge Dacoity Affected Area

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge Dacoity Affected Area

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Call For Report

    Special Judge Dacoity Affected Area

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Call For Report

    Special Judge Dacoity Affected Area

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 159/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by seven police officers (Udayraj Singh, Sunheri Lal, Samay Singh, Umendra Singh, Raj Narayan Singh, Umesh Upadhyay, and Awara Hussain) accused under Section 395 IPC (dacoity) in connection with an alleged looting of ₹48,000 and jewelry from a complainant's house in 2000. The court found insufficient grounds for anticipatory bail, noting that the case had been pending for 24 years and that the complainant had failed to produce independent eyewitnesses in court to substantiate serious allegations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case