State vs Rinku@shelendra Advocate - Omkar singh — 600104/2007
Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (prevention) Act Section 2/3. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd April 2026.
G.S.T. - Gangaster Sessions Trial
CNR: UPET010002392007
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
600104/2007
Filing Date
16-05-2007
Registration No
600104/2007
Registration Date
16-05-2007
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 03
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
NIDHOLI KALAN
Year
2007
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. ADGC Cri.
Respondent(s)
Rinku@shelendra Advocate - Omkar singh
Shyam vir(Name quashed from charge-sheet/complaint)
Adv. Nishant singh Pundhir
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Additional District And Sessions Judge, Court No. 03
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 31-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (Gangster Act) acquitted accused Rinku alias Shailendra of charges under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Organized Crime Prevention Act, 1986. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of a "gang" or prove that the accused acquired illegal assets or created terror in society. The acquittal was based on the absence of credible evidence linking the accused to organized criminal activity and the fact that he was previously acquitted in related cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (Gangster Act) acquitted accused Rinku alias Shailendra of charges under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Organized Crime Prevention Act, 1986. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of a "gang" or prove that the accused acquired illegal assets or created terror in society. The acquittal was based on the absence of credible evidence linking the accused to organized criminal activity and the fact that he was previously acquitted in related cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts