Mahesh Nishad vs Unknown — 18/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,106(1). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report

CNR: UPCH120000822026

Filing Number

80/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

18/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Judge Jr. Division, Chitrakoot, Mau

Judge

1-Civil Judge (Junior Div.)

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

124

Police Station

MAU

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,106(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahesh Nishad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Unknown

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court of Mau, Chitrakoot accepted the investigating officer's final report in a fatal hit-and-run case where complainant Mahesh Nishad's daughter Priyanka died in an accident caused by an unknown vehicle. The court found that despite investigation, the vehicle and driver could not be identified, and the complainant failed to appear or protest despite multiple opportunities, making the closure of the case appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge (Junior Div.)

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Junior Div.)

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Junior Div.)

  6. 03-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Junior Div.)

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Junior Div.)

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Junior Div.)

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 18/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court of Mau, Chitrakoot accepted the investigating officer's final report in a fatal hit-and-run case where complainant Mahesh Nishad's daughter Priyanka died in an accident caused by an unknown vehicle. The court found that despite investigation, the vehicle and driver could not be identified, and the complainant failed to appear or protest despite multiple opportunities, making the closure of the case appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case